The Difference Between Dreams and Visions: Three Kinds, Not Two

If you are asking about the difference between dreams and visions, the shortest accurate answer is that what a sleeper sees is not two things but three. In Sahih Muslim, the Book of Dreams, hadith 2263, Abu Hurayra reports from the Prophet ﷺ that dreams are of three kinds: a good dream, which is glad tidings from God; a distressing dream, which is from Satan; and a dream that comes from what a person tells himself. That third kind is the one most people see most nights, and it is the kind that is not meant to be interpreted at all.

The familiar split — a vision is from God, a dream is from Satan — is incomplete rather than wrong. Both halves of it are sound, but together they leave room only for pure good or pure evil, and most of what people see fits neither. That is where the confusion starts. You wake with a scene you cannot place, so you either hand it to Satan or go hunting for a meaning it never had.

This page takes three steps. It sets out the three kinds as the text names them, in plain language. Then it gives you practical signs that bring what you saw closer to one kind than another. Then it says what to do in each case, and what must never be built on a dream.

One warning first, because it will save you a great deal of time: there is no news about the future on this page. Interpretation, according to the people who practise it, is conjecture and possibility, not certainty. We stop at that line openly, because much of what is published on this subject crosses it and hands the reader something nobody actually has.

The bottom line

• The closest answer: Sahih Muslim, hadith 2263, names three kinds of dream — a good dream that is glad tidings from God, a distressing dream from Satan, and a dream from what a person tells himself. The division is threefold, not twofold, and everything else on this page follows from that.
• The detail that changes the reading: what the scene left behind once you were awake. Calm and good cheer point to the first kind. Fear and gloom point to the second. An echo of a worry or a wish that filled your day points to the third.
• Two common cases: a scattered, broken scene you have forgotten within minutes is as close as anything gets to a person’s own thoughts, and it has no interpretation. A frightening scene that jolts you awake is answered with seeking refuge in God and with silence, not with a search for its meaning.
• Good things are possible: the good dream is described as glad tidings from God, and glad tidings are good. But tidings are not a contract. They fix no date, no amount and no person, and they are not a promise of money on a known day.
• A possibility, not a promise: al-Sadhan, in al-Qawa’id al-Husna, holds that interpretation is analogy, comparison and conjecture that cannot be treated as certain, only drawn on for guidance. Anyone who gives you a definitive answer has gone past what the practitioners themselves allow.
• Where there is no answer: not every scene has a meaning of its own. Many of the images people ask about most are given no dedicated entry in the standard books, and we say so plainly rather than inventing something reassuring that is not true.

The one thing to carry away from that list: the difference is not a label you pick for the scene, it is a category you place it in, and each category has its own response. Once you know the three, most of what exhausts people about this subject falls away.

What a sleeper sees comes in three kinds, not two

Everything here rests on a single text. Muslim records it in his Sahih, in the Book of Dreams, hadith 2263, from Abu Hurayra, from the Prophet ﷺ. It names three kinds: a good dream that is glad tidings from God, a distressing dream from Satan, and a dream from what a person tells himself. The same hadith then directs anyone who sees something he dislikes to get up and pray, and not to tell people about it.

Notice something in the wording that changes the picture for a lot of readers: the same Arabic word, ru’ya, is used for all three kinds. The one from Satan is called a ru’ya. The one that comes from a person’s own thoughts is called a ru’ya too. So the two words people set against each other are not, in the original usage, two opposed categories that can never overlap.

That does not mean the familiar distinction between the two words is worthless. It became common, among scholars and among ordinary speakers, to reserve ru’ya — often rendered “vision” or “true dream” in English — for the good kind, and hulm — “dream” in the ordinary sense — for the unpleasant kind. It is a useful convention that shortens a lot of talk and puts the questioner at ease. Just know what it is: a distribution of names, not a dividing line that reveals where your dream came from the moment you label it.

The practical value of that point is considerable. Some readers ask: “Was what I saw a dream or a vision?” — as though the answer lay in the word. It does not. It lies in the description of the scene, the effect it left, and the state of the person who saw it. So we will set the question about the name aside and work on the question about the category.

The first kind: a good dream, glad tidings from God

The hadith describes this kind as glad tidings from God. Glad tidings means the announcement of something good that gladdens the person who receives it. The same hadith in Sahih Muslim, hadith 2263, adds another description of this kind: a Muslim’s good dream is one part of forty-five parts of prophecy. So the kind has its standing — and even so, it is one part out of forty-five. It is not prophecy, it is not revelation, and no ruling is built on it.

The descriptions most often attached to this kind are that it is clear and ordered, that it stays in the memory for a long time, and that the person wakes from it settled rather than shaken. Those are indicative signs, not decisive ones: they bring a scene closer to this category without placing it there for certain.

Among the manners belonging to this kind is what al-Bukhari records in his Sahih, hadith 7044, from Abu Qatada: if one of you sees something he likes, let him tell it only to someone he loves. That is a fine piece of advice. Good news that comes to you at night is not to be broadcast to everyone, and not dropped into a gathering where you do not know who is glad for you and who is not.

The same hadith in Sahih Muslim, hadith 2263, also gives a measure for the truthfulness of this kind: the most truthful of you in dreams are the most truthful of you in speech. In other words, the truthfulness of what a person sees at night is connected to his honesty while awake. That is a measure of character first. It is not a tool for sorting people, and it is not a licence to call anyone a liar because a scene he described did not come to pass.

One more thing must be said about this kind: glad tidings set no appointment and no amount. If you saw something that gladdened you, be grateful, do your work and wait. It is not right to drop one of the ordinary means of your life on the strength of a scene you saw, and not right to hold back a useful decision while you wait for another scene to confirm it.

The second kind: a distressing dream from Satan

Hadith 2263 in Sahih Muslim names this kind distress from Satan. The word is precise and extremely useful: the purpose of the scene is to sadden and frighten the sleeper, not to inform him of anything. From which follows an important principle — this kind is not to be interpreted. Anyone who sits down to comb a terrifying scene for a detailed meaning has given it more of himself than it deserves.

What makes that clear is that the guidance on this point was not to look for a meaning but to do something. In Sahih Muslim, hadith 2263, from Abu Hurayra, whoever sees something he dislikes is told to get up and pray, and not to tell people about it. The remedy is rising, praying and silence — not a sitting for interpretation and not a hunt for meanings.

There is nothing in this kind that obliges you to fear for yourself or for anyone in your family. A frightening scene establishes no illness, no death, no sorcery, no envy and no betrayal, and it points to no particular person’s intentions. The most you can rightly say about it is: I saw something I disliked, I did what I was directed to do, and that is the end of it.

That limit matters, because most of the harm people suffer from this subject does not come from the scene. It comes from the interpretation handed to them afterwards. Tell someone his dream indicates sorcery, or the hostility of a relative, and you have loaded him with a worry that was never in it — and you may well have spoiled things between him and his own household over a single night.

The third kind: what a person tells himself

This is the kind people see most, and the kind least often written about. Hadith 2263 in Sahih Muslim describes it as coming from what a person tells himself: an echo of what was already moving in you — a wish, a fear, something you are waiting for, an unfinished task, or a conversation you had shortly before you went to bed.

Al-Sadhan, in al-Qawa’id al-Husna, explains this kind in practical terms. He says that what a person tells himself is connected to the body — desires and feelings that were pushed down, which wake up during sleep and have no interpretation. So the correct answer to many of the questions that reach us is simply: this scene has no meaning. There is nothing deficient or evasive about that answer.

That one point resolves half of most readers’ confusion. If you have been thinking about a journey, or an exam, or a person whose news you are waiting for, and then you see exactly that at night, the likeliest thing is that you saw yourself rather than a message. Take the echo of your own worry as information about the future and you enter a closed loop: you worry, so you see; you see, so you worry more.

The marks of this kind are usually visible. The scene sits close to your day. It is scattered. It is forgotten quickly. It leaves little behind. And it multiplies in the seasons when work and anxiety pile up. The most useful thing a person can do here is look at his sleep and his worries, not go looking for a symbol.

There is also a kindness in this category that is worth naming. It gives you permission to let a scene go. Readers often feel that dismissing a dream is careless, as though they might be ignoring something sent to them. The text itself makes room for the ordinary: a great deal of what you see is simply your own mind finishing the day’s business.

Why people say a vision is from God and a dream is from Satan

Because people need a short name for each idea. Since one kind is glad tidings and another is distress, it became easy to reserve one word for the first and another word for the second. The convention is common in writing and in religious answers, it helps people understand one another quickly, and we have no objection to it.

What we do object to is turning the name into a verdict. Someone who saw a pleasant scene is told: that is a vision, so build on it. Someone who saw an unpleasant one is told: that is a dream, so throw it away. Yet the pleasant scene may be the echo of a wish in the dreamer’s own heart, and the unpleasant one the echo of a fear he lived through during the day — and neither of them belongs in the two categories named.

Scholars have answered the terminological and legal side of this question in many places, and anyone who wants a ruling on it should go to people qualified to give one. We do not issue religious rulings here. What this page does is set out what the texts say and mark the edges of it.

The summary of this section: work with the description, not the name. Describe the scene, describe its effect on you, and describe your state before you slept. Those three things point you to the category. The name comes afterwards, not before.

Quick table: three kinds, three responses

This table gathers what has come so far into one view. Read it as an aid to sorting, not as a measure that settles your case.

Notice that the last column is the important one. The useful question is not “what does what I saw mean?” but “what do I do now?” Each of the three kinds has a clear action, and the matter ends there.

How to tell which kind is closest

Nobody can tell you the category for certain, because the source of the scene is unseen. But there are signs that writers on the subject mention, and they bring a scene closer without deciding it. Four of them are set out below, followed by questions to put to yourself in the morning.

First: clarity and order

An ordered scene with a beginning, a middle and an end, which you can retell in one intelligible sentence, sits closer to the first kind. A broken scene in which places and people keep changing with nothing linking them, and which you cannot retell except in scattered words, sits closer to a person’s own thoughts.

This test is very practical, and you can run it yourself: tell the scene out loud to yourself. If the telling holds together, you are dealing with a scene that has a shape. If it keeps falling apart on you, the likelier thing is that your mind was tidying up its day and nothing more.

Be honest in the retelling, though. It is easy to smooth a scene as you describe it, filling gaps with words that were not there. If you find yourself adding a “and then probably” to make the story flow, that is a sign the scene had no shape to begin with.

Second: what stayed with you after waking

Look at yourself a quarter of an hour after you wake. If calm and lightness remain in your chest, that is closer to glad tidings. If tightness and fear follow you about, that is closer to distress. If nothing remains at all, and you slip back into your day as though nothing had happened, then in most cases it was a person’s own thoughts.

The effect is more reliable than the details. Many people memorise a long list of details and ask about them one by one, when a look at the effect that stayed behind would have saved them the journey. Details serve a meaning; they do not create one.

Third: what was on your mind before sleep

Ask yourself: what was the last thing you thought about before you slept? What was the last thing you watched, read or heard? If there is a close link between that and your scene, the third category is the nearest. This is not a rule we invented; it is the sense of the hadith’s own phrase about what a person tells himself, in Sahih Muslim, hadith 2263.

One of the most useful things you can do here is write two lines on a piece of paper: what occupied me yesterday, and what I saw last night. Do that for a week and you will see for yourself that most of what you see is an echo of your day, and that the scenes which resemble nothing in your day are few.

Fourth: when and how long you slept

How much you see, and how sharply you remember it, is tied to your sleep more than people suppose. Broken sleep, waking in the middle of the night, and too few hours all make a person remember more of what he sees and react to it more strongly. That is a general medical point with nothing symbolic about it.

So it is not right to read a run of unpleasant scenes across a heavy, high-pressure week as a sequence of messages. The likelier thing is that you are sleeping badly and your mind is full, so your nights have become an echo of your days.

Now, five questions to ask yourself in the morning, before you ask anyone else:

• Can I retell what I saw in one intelligible sentence?
• What is left in me a quarter of an hour later: calm, tightness, or nothing?
• Is there anything in it that resembles what occupied me yesterday, or what I watched before bed?
• How was my sleep last night: unbroken or broken? And how many hours did I get?
• Am I facing a decision that this scene might push me into, or pull me away from?

The last question is the most serious of the five. If the scene is going to push you into cutting off a relationship, leaving a job, or levelling an accusation at someone, stop. Nothing in this subject carries that kind of weight, and nothing in it makes a sound basis for a decision.

What to do if you see something you dislike

Here another gap opens up between what the texts say and what gets published. What gets published works on the meaning; the texts work on the action. Clear practices are recorded on this point, and they are set out below with their sources, then explained.

Al-Bukhari records in his Sahih, hadith 7044, from Abu Qatada, that a good dream is from God; that whoever sees something he dislikes should seek refuge in God from its harm and from the harm of Satan, spit lightly three times, and tell nobody about it — and that it will not harm him. The end of that hadith is where the relief lies: it will not harm him.

Muslim records in his Sahih, the Book of Dreams, hadith 2262, from Jabir, that whoever sees a dream he dislikes should spit to his left three times, seek refuge in God from Satan three times, and turn over from the side he was lying on. The addition here concerns changing the position the sleeper was in.

Taken together, those two reports and hadith 2263 in Sahih Muslim give a five-step action, all of it within anyone’s reach:

• Seeking refuge: you seek refuge in God from the harm of what you saw and from the harm of Satan. Muslim’s wording has it three times.
• Spitting lightly to the left: three times, as both reports have it — a small act that gives a person the sense of having pushed the matter away from himself.
• Turning over: you move off the side you were lying on, as in hadith 2262 in Sahih Muslim.
• Getting up to pray: as in hadith 2263 in Sahih Muslim, where whoever sees something he dislikes is told to get up and pray.
• Telling nobody about it: the heaviest of the steps for most people, and the most useful, as the next section explains.

Read the list again and notice what is absent from it. There is no step that involves finding out what the scene meant, no step that involves identifying who sent it, and no step that involves protecting yourself from a named person. The whole procedure is designed to close the matter, not to open an investigation.

Why not telling anyone is stressed so strongly

Because talking about an unpleasant scene multiplies it. You repeat it to yourself once; then whoever hears it repeats it back to you in a worse version; then someone with no knowledge joins in and gives you a meaning no book states and no scholar said. Two days later your worry is several times the size of what you actually saw.

Al-Bukhari’s hadith 7044 contains the reassurance on this point: it will not harm him. Harm is ruled out for the person who acts on these practices. If you want to keep your peace of mind, do the actions and do not open a door to interpretation for yourself.

There is one exception worth naming, and it is the good kind rather than the unpleasant one: al-Bukhari’s hadith 7044 permits telling a good dream to someone you love. So the silence being asked of you is not secrecy for its own sake. It is a way of keeping an unpleasant scene from being passed around and enlarged.

And if the matter has gone beyond you — if you are living in constant fear of what you see at night, to the point where your sleep or your day is affected — that is a situation to take to a doctor or a qualified specialist, not a situation for interpretation. We do not diagnose anyone and we do not prescribe anything; we point to the right door.

Rules of interpretation most people overlook

Even supposing a scene belongs to the first kind, speaking about its meaning runs on rules. Those rules are what keep a sound answer qualified, always, and stop it ever becoming one answer for everybody. Three of them are given here from a contemporary book that gathers this craft together: al-Qawa’id al-Husna by al-Sadhan.

Rule one: this is conjecture, not certainty

Al-Sadhan states that this craft is analogy, comparison and conjecture that cannot be treated as certain — it may be drawn on for guidance, and no oath may be sworn on what it conceals unless waking life shows it to be true. That sentence ought to be pinned to the top of every dream interpretation page on the internet.

In plain language: the interpreter compares and draws analogies, and then says “it may be” and “perhaps”. So if somebody tells you “this means such and such” with no qualification, he has stepped outside the method of the people who practise this, and is giving you something of his own. Being definitive here is not strength of knowledge; it is a shortage of it.

A piece of manners towards other people follows from this rule. Do not pass a definitive meaning to anyone. Do not tell a woman her scene indicates a pregnancy, or a man that his indicates an illness, or anyone that his indicates a relative plotting against him. All of that lies outside what the rule permits.

Rule two: the meaning changes with the dreamer

Al-Sadhan also states that this craft differs according to people’s conditions and standing: the dreamer’s situation and standing have to be looked at, and the fitting interpretation built on that. In other words, a single scene is read two different ways for two different people.

That rule by itself is enough to undo the “type in your symbol and collect its meaning” approach. A page that hands every reader the same meaning contradicts a rule the practitioners state openly. Which is why our pages are written the other way round: here is what the book says, here is what qualifies it, and here is what must not be built on it.

The same rule tells us that a person’s condition takes in his work, his age, what he fears, what he hopes for, and what he is about to face. A scene seen by someone on a journey is not read the way it is read for someone settled at home. That is not playing with meanings; it is the method itself.

Rule three: the accompanying detail decides

Al-Sadhan further states that the accompanying detail in a dream is what interpretation relies on, so the meaning is sought according to whether that detail is present. The detail is the circumstance that comes with the symbol: the condition of the thing you saw, its form, and what you did with it. His example is fish — fresh fish is a woman, grilled fish is provision without effort, and salted fish is travel in search of knowledge.

Look at how one symbol became three meanings when a single detail changed. Fish is fish in all three pictures; what changed was its condition — fresh, grilled or salted. That is what is meant by saying the detail governs, and why it is not sound to ask about a symbol stripped of the scene it appeared in.

We give these examples as a contemporary author’s reasoning, showing a method, not as rulings. Anyone who wants this particular symbol in detail will find where to go near the end of this page.

Put the three rules side by side and you have a fair test for any interpretation you are offered. Is it qualified or definitive? Does it ask about you, or does it treat all readers alike? Does it ask what the thing looked like and what you did with it, or does it answer a bare symbol? An answer that fails those three is not a stronger answer. It is a looser one.

Joseph’s dream: where the image comes from

The dream of Joseph is often cited to show the standing of this subject. Its place is at the beginning of Surah Yusuf, verse 4: “When Joseph said to his father: my father, I saw eleven stars, and the sun and the moon; I saw them prostrating to me” (Yusuf 12:4; our translation).

The setting it appears in is the story of a prophet. Joseph tells his father Jacob what he saw, and the surah then runs through a long sequence of events until the meaning of what he saw becomes clear years later. That is the place of the image: in the Qur’an it is a verse within a prophet’s story, not a general rule by which every sleeper measures what he saw.

Two cautions follow. First, the fact that a prophet’s dream came true does not mean that everything people see comes true. Second, Jacob’s understanding of what his son described came by the knowledge of prophethood; it is not a door that anyone who has read a book on the craft can walk through. We mention the verse to show where the image comes from, not to argue from it about anybody’s dream.

The story itself holds a practical point that suits this page: Jacob told his son to keep what he had seen to himself. Keeping it quiet is an old practice in this matter, and it agrees with what came earlier from al-Bukhari’s hadith 7044 — that a good dream is told only to someone you love.

What general sleep references add

There is no conflict between what has come so far and what general medical references say about sleep, because each speaks about a different side of the matter. The texts speak about the source and the response. The medical references speak about what happens in the body and the brain while a person sleeps.

The gist of what general references say here is that sleep runs in successive stages, and that most of what a person remembers of what he saw occurs in a stage when brain activity is high. They also note that nightmares increase with stress and psychological pressure, with too little and too broken sleep, and with certain medicines and health conditions. The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke guide to sleep and the Sleep Foundation page on nightmares are the references for that.

The use of all this for our reader is practical: a great deal of what reaches us is not a complaint about meaning, it is a complaint about sleep. Someone who sleeps four broken hours, wakes several times in the night, drinks stimulants late and gets into bed carrying the day’s worries is going to see a great deal and remember a great deal.

So the first thing we suggest to anyone worn out by a run of unpleasant scenes is not a search for an interpretation. It is putting sleep in order: a fixed time for going to bed and getting up, fewer stimulants late in the day, a calmer last hour before bed, and staying away from frightening material before sleep. If it carries on and affects your life, a medical review is the way forward.

We say all of this without diagnosing and without prescribing any treatment. This is not a medical page. It simply points at a near cause that gets overlooked by people searching for a distant one.

Three worked examples

Let us bring all of that down to cases close to the questions readers send. Notice in each one that no settled meaning is given; what is given is an order of steps.

The first example: a woman has been waiting several days for the result of a medical test. She dreams she is running along a long road and never arriving. She wakes unsettled and spends the day asking what running in a dream means.

The right ordering here: the scene sits close to what occupies her, the effect left behind is unease, and the waiting was already in place before she slept. So the nearest thing is a person’s own thoughts, and there is no interpretation for it. The most useful thing she can do is seek refuge in God, let the scene go, and wait for her result from the people who have it. Reading the scene as news of an illness is not sound in any way.

The second example: a man sees a clear, ordered scene containing good news about something he hopes for at work. He wakes cheerful, and the scene stays in his memory for a week. He then starts thinking about leaving his job on the strength of it.

The ordering here: the description brings the scene close to the first kind, and that is a good thing. But glad tidings are not a contract, and the rule already given is that this is conjecture, not certainty. What is sound is that he thank God, keep his good news to someone who loves him, stay with his ordinary means, and take his decision on the arithmetic of his job rather than the arithmetic of one night.

The third example: a young man sees a frightening scene full of darkness and fear. The person he tells says: this is sorcery, go and find out who your enemy is. He begins to suspect the people closest to him.

The ordering here: the scene sits close to the second kind, and the response the texts specify is seeking refuge in God, prayer and silence. As for attributing it to sorcery and identifying an enemy, neither the scene nor any text will carry that. The real harm in this example came from the answer the young man was given, not from his night.

Seven common mistakes

• Sticking to two kinds. This is the root of most of the confusion. The text in Sahih Muslim, hadith 2263, names three.
• Judging by the name instead of the description. “This is a vision”, so it gets built on; “this is a dream”, so it gets thrown away — before anyone looked at the scene and its effect.
• Seeking a meaning for what has no meaning. The second kind is not to be interpreted, and the third kind has no interpretation.
• Being definitive where only conjecture is available. The practitioners of this craft qualify what they say with possibility; whoever speaks definitively has departed from them.
• Asking about a symbol stripped of its scene. The accompanying detail is what tips the meaning, so a question about a bare symbol is an incomplete question.
• Building a decision or an accusation on a scene. This is the most dangerous of the seven for households and relationships, and no text and no rule supports it.
• Ignoring sleep and stress. A great many complaints are caused by a bad night and a heavy week, not by a repeated message.

Look at those seven and you will find they all go back to one root: rushing the answer. The sound answer in these matters is slow, qualified and modest in size, which is exactly why it disappoints anyone who wants quick certainty.

Two questions that keep coming in

The first is about seeking guidance in prayer. Many readers ask: I prayed and asked God to guide my choice, so what am I waiting to see at night? The plain answer is that this is a supplication asking for God’s help towards what is best, and nothing in the texts this page relies on makes a dream a condition of it or a sign that it was accepted. Anyone who wants a detailed ruling should take it to people qualified to give religious answers; we do not give them.

What follows from that is practical: do not hang your decision on a scene you are waiting for. A person who has prayed for guidance goes ahead with the matter while taking the ordinary means, and waiting for a scene to confirm a decision can hold you up for weeks to no purpose — and may lead you to read any scene at all as the answer you wanted.

The second is about repetition. Many readers see the same scene several times and suppose that repetition alone gives a scene a stronger meaning. Stated plainly: the sources this page relies on do not give repetition a meaning of its own, so we do not establish one for it.

But repetition does have another, useful reading. More often than not it is a sign that something particular is occupying you and has not been resolved, or that your sleep has been disturbed over this period. That fits the category of a person’s own thoughts, and it fits what medical references say about recurring nightmares under stress. So look at the near cause first.

If you would like a wider treatment of how one symbol is read from its details, our general English guide to dream interpretation sets out the same method applied across many images.

Two symbols people ask about next

Two symbols come up again and again from readers of this page, so we apply what has gone before to them: we say what is recorded, with its source, and we stay silent about what has none.

Teeth falling out

This is one of the most asked-about images, and one of the most freely loaded with large meanings that have nothing behind them. Much of what is published about it traces back to a well-known book sold in the shops that is attributed to Ibn Sirin; that attribution is not established, which is why we do not write “he said” but rather: a book attributed to Ibn Sirin states. Even so, what circulates about this symbol goes far beyond what the books contain.

We will not give you a meaning for it here, because giving a meaning requires quoting a particular book and naming the detail that qualifies it. We have a full page that works that way, and you can go to it: teeth falling out in a dream.

What matters here is one thing: people are frightened with this symbol a great deal, and things are said about it that no book says. It is not sound to read a single scene as news of anyone’s death or illness, and whoever told you otherwise has gone past his limit.

Fish

We saw, under the rule about the accompanying detail, what al-Sadhan says about fish: fresh fish is a woman, grilled fish is provision without effort, and salted fish is travel in search of knowledge. Those are examples that show a method more than they hand down rulings — and even so they are a quotation from a particular book that we name.

Notice the difference between that and what is usually published. What is published says “fish means provision” and stops there. The book ties each picture to its own condition and makes the meaning follow the detail. If you want this symbol in detail, we have a page for it: dreaming of fish.

It is not sound to take a scene with fish in it as a promise of provision at a known time, or as good news of a pregnancy, or as news of a marriage. The book that recorded those meanings recorded them as qualified possibilities, and the rule already given is that this is conjecture, not certainty.

If you would like a long worked example of all these distinctions applied to a single image, see our general English page on snake dreams, where each point separates what is quoted from a named book, what is an interpreter’s reasoning, and what is a modern psychological reading.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a dream and a vision?

The sound difference is threefold, not twofold. In Sahih Muslim, hadith 2263, what a sleeper sees is of three kinds: a good dream that is glad tidings from God, a distressing dream from Satan, and a dream from what a person tells himself. Reserving “vision” for the good kind and “dream” for the unpleasant one is a common and useful convention, but it is not a boundary that reveals where what you saw came from.

Is a true dream always accurate?

That cannot be asserted. Hadith 2263 in Sahih Muslim gives a measure — the most truthful of you in dreams are the most truthful of you in speech — and states that a Muslim’s good dream is one part of forty-five parts of prophecy. So it is a part, not the whole; it is not revelation and not confirmed news about the future, and no ruling and no decision is built on it.

How do I tell the three kinds apart?

By four signs that bring a scene closer without settling it: how clear and ordered the scene was, what effect stayed with you after waking, its connection to what occupied you before sleep, and the state of your sleep that night. An ordered scene that leaves calm sits closer to the first kind, a frightening one to the second, and a scattered one close to your day to the third.

Does everything I see in my sleep have a meaning?

No. The largest share of what people see is what a person tells himself, and al-Sadhan, in al-Qawa’id al-Husna, says these are desires and feelings that were pushed down, which wake up during sleep and have no interpretation. Likewise, what is distress from Satan is not to be interpreted; it is met with seeking refuge in God, with prayer, and with not talking about it.

Is there a particular time when true dreams occur?

Neither of the two reports quoted here — hadith 2263 in Sahih Muslim and hadith 7044 in Sahih al-Bukhari — fixes a time. The idea that a true dream comes in the last third of the night is widely repeated among people, and we do not establish it from a text on this page. What can soundly be said is that sleep late in the night is lighter, so a person remembers more of what he sees in it.

What is the use of knowing this difference?

Its use is that you know what to do, not that you know what will happen. If the scene belongs to the first kind, you give thanks, keep it to someone who loves you, and stay with your ordinary means. If it belongs to the second, you seek refuge in God, pray and stay quiet. If it belongs to the third, you let it go and look at your sleep and your worries. That way the matter closes in minutes.

Are the kinds interpreted the same way?

No. The second and third kinds are not to be interpreted at all. The first is discussed under rules: that the matter is conjecture rather than certainty, that the meaning differs with the dreamer’s situation and standing, and that the accompanying detail is what interpretation relies on. Anyone who hands every reader one meaning has broken those rules.

What is the difference between a good dream and a person’s own thoughts?

The good dream is described in hadith 2263 in Sahih Muslim as glad tidings from God, and what is most often mentioned in describing it is clarity, order and a lasting effect. A person’s own thoughts are an echo of what was already moving in you, and its marks are closeness to the business of your day, scatteredness and quick forgetting. The effect that stays with you after waking is the most reliable thing to look at.

What makes me see so many unpleasant scenes?

From the side of the texts: what is distress from Satan is met with seeking refuge in God, prayer and silence — the practices recorded in hadith 7044 in Sahih al-Bukhari and hadith 2262 in Sahih Muslim. From the side of sleep: general medical references note that nightmares increase with stress, with too little and too broken sleep, and with certain medicines and health conditions. Look at your sleep and your pressures first, and if it is affecting your life, a medical review is the way forward.

Can I base a decision on what I saw, or accuse someone?

No. This subject is conjecture rather than certainty, and no oath may be sworn on what it conceals. It establishes no illness, no death, no sorcery, no envy and no betrayal, and no particular person’s intentions. Anyone told that his scene indicates a relative’s hostility has been loaded with a groundless worry, and a relationship may be ruined over a single night.

In summary

If we compress the difference between dreams and visions into lines that are actually useful:

• What a sleeper sees comes in three kinds, as in hadith 2263 in Sahih Muslim, not two.
• The name does not decide. What decides is the description of the scene, its effect, and the state of the person who saw it.
• The second and third kinds are not to be interpreted, and that alone puts most questioners at ease.
• The first kind is glad tidings, and glad tidings are good without being a contract: no date, no amount.
• Whoever sees something he dislikes has a specified action: seeking refuge in God, spitting lightly, turning over, prayer, and not talking about it.
• All of this is conjecture and possibility. It is not news about the future and not a verdict on anybody.
• If unpleasant scenes recur and wear you down, start with your sleep and your pressures, then with a doctor if needed.

If you leave this page with one thing, let it be that the useful question here is not “what does what I saw mean?” but “which of the three kinds is it, and what do I do now?” Answer those two and you will be at ease — and so will everyone around you.

اقرأ هذه المقالة بالعربية